Unibet-Logo-blackU-Icon-black
NFL Disability Lawsuit Moves Forward

NFL Disability Lawsuit Moves Forward

A recent lawsuit has cast a spotlight on the NFL's handling of disability claims, accusing the league's disability plan of systematically denying valid injury claims from retired players. The legal action, which is now set to proceed to trial on most counts, could bring significant changes to how former players are compensated for injuries sustained during their careers.

Class Action Suit Gains Traction

The lawsuit specifically targets the board responsible for overseeing the disability plan, rather than any individuals such as Commissioner Roger Goodell or the trustees. This class action case has already attracted the support of ten retired players, signaling a growing concern among former athletes over the league's treatment of its veterans. Leading the legal charge are attorneys Chris Seeger and Sam Katz, both known for their work in representing players' interests. Notably, Seeger played a pivotal role in the concussion-related lawsuits that resulted in over $1 billion in settlements for affected players.

Accusations of Bad Faith

At the heart of the lawsuit are accusations of bad faith and violations of federal law by officials managing the NFL disability program. This program, established as part of the 2011 collective-bargaining agreement, aimed to provide financial support to players dealing with injuries from their time in the league. Despite expectations that the disability plan's payouts would reach around $330 million last year, with individual payments ranging from $65,000 to $265,000, plaintiffs allege systemic issues have led to unjust claim denials.

One particularly damning allegation is that certain doctors, repeatedly referred by the program, have a track record of denying claims. According to the lawsuit, one neuropsychologist evaluated 29 players and denied every single claim. This pattern, if proven, would suggest a deliberate effort to withhold rightful benefits from injured players, further underscoring the lawsuit's claims of systemic injustice.

Plaintiffs Share Disturbing Stories

The implications of these denied claims are more than financial; they have profound impacts on the lives of the players involved. Among the plaintiffs is Willis McGahee, who has undergone over a dozen surgeries following his NFL career. Eric Smith, another plaintiff, shared harrowing details of experiencing blackouts and violent episodes, illustrating the severe consequences of untreated injuries. Mike McKenzie, also a plaintiff, suffers from debilitating headaches and pain, a direct result of his time in the league.

Calls for Accountability and Reform

The legal team has expressed optimism following a judge's ruling that allows the case to move forward to the discovery phase. Describing the decision as "a huge win," the attorneys emphasized the importance of holding the NFL disability plan accountable and advocating for a fairer system for retired players. The sentiment is echoed in personal testimonies, like Smith's account of his distressing symptoms, underscoring the urgent need for reform.

The lawsuit represents not just a legal battle but a fight for justice for those who have suffered due to the NFL's alleged failure to uphold its responsibility to its former players. As the case progresses, it has the potential to reveal the extent of the systemic issues within the NFL's disability program and force changes that would ensure fair treatment for all retired players moving forward.

Aside from McGahee, Smith, and McKenzie, other plaintiffs include Jason Alford, Daniel Loper, Jamize Olaware, Alex Parsons, Charles Sims, Joey Thomas, and Lance Zeno. Their involvement underscores the widespread nature of the grievances against the NFL's disability policies, and their cases will be closely watched by both the sports community and the public at large.

As the lawsuit heads toward trial, the promise of shedding light on the alleged "betrayal by the NFL" offers a glimmer of hope for many former players. The outcome could finally correct what many see as a long-standing injustice within one of America's most cherished institutions.